Uber Challenges D.C. Robotaxi Legislation
Uber is lobbying against a proposed Washington, D.C. bill that would authorize commercial autonomous vehicle (AV) operations. The company argues the legislation unfairly favors rivals like Waymo and threatens to displace human drivers. At the heart of the standoff is a fundamental question: should the District permit independent robotaxi fleets, or mandate a “hybrid” model requiring all platforms to keep humans behind the wheel?
Modernizing the 2012 Autonomous Vehicle Act
Introduced in May by Councilmember Charles Allen, the bill aims to overhaul the District’s 2012 Autonomous Vehicle Act. If enacted, it would empower the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) to issue permits for driverless commercial operations. Currently, firms like Waymo and Zoox are limited to testing with human safety operators present.
The proposed framework imposes strict oversight, including a $5 million liability insurance requirement and rigorous crash-reporting timelines. It also introduces a $0.15 per-mile tax on robotaxi travel, with proceeds earmarked for public transit and workforce development for drivers displaced by automation.
The Push for a Hybrid Platform
Uber, which relies on a vast network of human contractors, is fighting for a regulatory mandate that preserves the hybrid model. Javi Correoso, who leads U.S. policy and federal affairs for the company, maintains that consumers should have a guaranteed option to select a human-driven vehicle on any ride-hailing app.
In a letter submitted to the D.C. Council, Uber warned that an “AV-only” approach risks fostering monopolies. The company argues that such a model ignores passengers who require physical assistance—a service human drivers are uniquely equipped to provide. Their vision centers on a single platform matching trips to either a human driver or an autonomous vehicle, based on availability and specific trip parameters.
Waymo Defends Independent Deployment
Alphabet-owned Waymo, currently the largest robotaxi operator in the U.S. with over 500,000 weekly rides across 11 cities, is backing the bill. The company contends the legislation offers a clear, equitable path for autonomous technology without imposing restrictive mandates on network configurations. Waymo has publicly stated it does not support efforts to limit AVs to specific types of network structures.
Shifting Strategies in a Contentious Market
The D.C. debate holds weight far beyond the capital. While Uber and Waymo previously partnered to offer robotaxi rides via the Uber app in Phoenix, Austin, and Atlanta, their relationship has grown increasingly strained.
Uber’s current lobbying effort marks a departure from its earlier, aggressive anti-regulation stance. Following legal battles over gig worker classification—most notably California’s Proposition 22—the company is now positioning itself as a municipal partner. Uber Chief Operating Officer Andrew Macdonald noted in a May LinkedIn post that the company has moved away from its former “grow-at-all-costs” approach to avoid the regulatory crises that previously damaged its reputation.
As the D.C. Council prepares for hearings, the outcome rests on whether the District will prioritize an open market for developers or enforce a hybrid model that secures a role for human drivers. The bill’s path to approval remains uncertain, with stakeholders hoping for a resolution before the end of the year.
Keep reading