President Aleksandar Vučić said Serbia will know by Đurđevdan on May 6 or shortly after when parliamentary elections will be held, ending weeks of speculation about a possible summer vote.
The announcement came after the opening of a new bridge in Tomaševac, where Vučić responded to questions about opposition claims and internal divisions within rival parties.
He acknowledged the opposition has momentum from recent elections in Hungary, where voters ousted Viktor Orbán’s allies and said if the Serbian people want change, they will have the chance to win.
Vučić warned that regardless of the outcome, there will be no new railways or roads built, only closures, as has been the pattern under his leadership.
The timing of the election remains uncertain, with Vučić previously suggesting dates ranging from May 31 to July 10 or later in the year, depending on global developments.
According to election law, the vote must occur between 45 and 60 days after the presidential announcement, meaning a May 31 vote would require an announcement by April 16.
Vučić has tied the decision to global conditions, stating summer elections would be avoided if a major crisis emerges but could proceed if peace advances, particularly referencing the Iran-Israel-U.S. Conflict.
He likewise noted that high turnout in recent local elections across ten municipalities was unfavorable for the ruling party, potentially motivating consideration of a summer vote when many citizens are on holiday.
The last time Serbia held national elections in summer was in 2004, when Borislav Tadić won the presidential runoff on June 27. all other votes have traditionally avoided the vacation period.
For more on this story, see Explosives Found Near Russian Gas Pipeline at Serbia-Hungary Border.
Student activists and parts of the opposition have demanded extraordinary elections for nearly a year, citing democratic deficits and calling for a joint student-opposition list.
Two models for such a list were discussed on the Utisak nedelje show: one where opposition candidates join the student slate but pledge not to enter government, and another where they remain separate but could join the executive later.
Political scientist Zoran Stojiljković accused Vučić of manipulating election timing to exploit seasonal voting patterns, noting wealthier supporters tend to travel in summer while poorer voters stay home.
He warned that Vučić’s hesitation mirrors Viktor Orbán’s downfall, where delayed elections led to a loss of public tolerance despite foreign backing.
The president dismissed concerns about strategy, saying there is “no great philosophy” behind the shifting dates, though analysts spot the moves as an effort to preempt protests and student mobilizations.
With the Đurđevdan deadline approaching, political attention now focuses on whether Vučić will announce a vote that could reshape Serbia’s parliamentary landscape before summer.
Why is the government considering summer elections despite traditional avoidance of the period?
The government sees low summer turnout as potentially advantageous, especially after unfavorable results in recent local elections, and wants to vote before citizens feel the economic impact of global crises like the Iran-Israel-U.S. Conflict.
What legal window determines when elections must be held after the announcement?
Under Serbian law, parliamentary elections must be scheduled between 45 and 60 days after the president announces them, limiting flexibility in timing.
How have recent elections in Hungary influenced Vučić’s calculations?
Vučić cited the large wave of opposition victories in Hungary as creating momentum for Serbia’s opposition, which he acknowledged could translate into electoral success if Serb voters demand change.
What contradiction exists in Vučić’s stance on summer elections?
While he previously ruled out summer votes during a global crisis, he now says they could proceed if peace is made, showing a shift in conditionality tied to international developments rather than domestic readiness.