Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s decision to adopt the title "First Partner" upon her husband’s election as Governor of California marked a departure from the traditional "First Lady" designation, reflecting a broader shift in how political spouses define their roles. While the transition signals a break from historical gender norms, it follows a long line of predecessors who navigated the complexities of public expectation, professional identity, and the lack of a formal job description for the spouse of an elected official.
The Evolution of the Gubernatorial Spouse in California
The role of the California governor’s spouse has historically been shaped by the individual’s own career and comfort level with public life. Maria Shriver, who served as First Lady during Arnold Schwarzenegger’s tenure from 2003, initially struggled with the transition from her career as a network news correspondent and anchor. Despite her early reluctance, Shriver utilized her position to launch the world’s largest Women’s Conference, revamp the state history museum, and implement programs for low-income families.
Other predecessors maintained a more private profile. Anne Gust Brown, a lawyer and wife of Edmund G. “Jerry” Brown, often acted as an unpaid aide behind the scenes. She frequently expressed discomfort with the title of "First Lady," viewing it as a role she did not naturally inhabit, preferring to focus on substantive policy and legal work rather than public-facing ceremonial duties.
Historical Precedents and Public Scrutiny
The scrutiny surrounding the spouses of U.S. presidents and governors often stems from the fact that the role is not constitutionally or legally defined. Martha Washington, the nation’s first first lady, famously described her duties as host of presidential drawing rooms as feeling "more like a state prisoner" than a public figure.
In the 20th century, some spouses expanded the role significantly. Eleanor Roosevelt redefined the position during her husband’s presidency by acting as an active political surrogate, traveling to the theaters of war in the South Pacific during World War II and writing a nationally syndicated column. Conversely, Hillary Clinton’s involvement in public policy, specifically her lead on universal healthcare in the 1990s, drew intense political backlash. According to Barbara A. Perry, a professor of governance at the University of Virginia, the public reaction to Clinton was partly fueled by the "unaccountable" nature of the position; because the role is not an official office, voters often react negatively when a spouse appears to exert significant, non-elected power.
Modern Shifts and the "First Partner" Label
The shift toward more professionalized or nontraditional roles has accelerated in recent years. In 2021, Jill Biden became the first first lady to maintain a professional career outside the White House, continuing her work as a teacher at Northern Virginia Community College.
This trend is not limited to women. The rise of LGBTQ+ politicians and the increased visibility of spouses like Doug Emhoff, who served as second gentleman while maintaining his own professional trajectory, suggests that the "silent partner" model is becoming outdated. However, experts note that labels like "First Partner" can still invite targeted political criticism. Debbie Walsh, director of the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University, suggests that while the role is evolving, nontraditional titles remain a point of contention that political opponents may use to frame a candidate as being out of step with traditional values.
Key Factors in the Changing Role
- Lack of Formal Definition: Because the role of a spouse is not an official government office, it lacks clear boundaries, leading to varied interpretations by every occupant.
- Professional Identity: Modern spouses are increasingly prioritizing their own careers, shifting the focus away from the traditional, ceremonial "hostess" duties.
- Political Polarization: As political discourse intensifies, the title and activities of a spouse are frequently subjected to the same ideological scrutiny as the elected official they support.
- Inclusivity: The entry of more diverse leaders into executive offices ensures that the traditional "First Lady" nomenclature will continue to be challenged to better reflect modern family structures.
Related reading