Florida Traffic Citation Dismissed After Driver Proves Physical Impossibility
A traffic citation issued to a Florida woman has been officially dismissed following a viral incident that gained national attention. Katie Thomas, who was pulled over by a Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Deputy, had been fined $116 for allegedly using a mobile phone while driving, despite the fact that she does not have a right hand.
The Traffic Stop That Went Viral
The incident occurred in February 2026. Body camera footage obtained by ABC News shows the moment the deputy stopped Thomas, claiming he observed her “holding the phone with your right hand, manipulating that phone” while she was driving.

In response to the accusation, Thomas held up her right arm to show the deputy that she was physically unable to hold a phone in that hand. The encounter, which Thomas later shared on social media, quickly gained traction as viewers questioned the deputy’s initial observation.
Dismissal of Charges
Following the stop, Thomas contested the citation. Palm Beach County court records confirm that the case was dismissed this past Tuesday at the request of the sheriff’s office. The official reason provided for the dismissal was “insufficient evidence.”
In a formal statement regarding the case, the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office explained that the deputy had initiated the stop based on his visual observations made in real time. The office further noted that the decision to drop the case followed an “additional review of the Florida State Statutes involved and based upon the totality of the circumstances.”
Key Takeaways
- Incident Overview: A driver was cited for texting while driving, despite having a missing right hand.
- Legal Outcome: The $116 citation was dismissed by the court for insufficient evidence.
- Official Stance: The sheriff’s office emphasized that law enforcement must make split-second decisions, but noted that motorists maintain the right to contest citations through the judicial process.
The Importance of the Judicial Process
The sheriff’s office highlighted that traffic enforcement often requires officers to make decisions based on what they observe in the moment. However, the department acknowledged that the judicial system serves as a necessary check, allowing for all facts and evidence to be fully evaluated when a driver disputes a citation.
This case serves as a reminder of the mechanisms in place for drivers to challenge traffic enforcement actions. By utilizing the court system, individuals can present evidence that may not have been apparent or considered during the initial traffic stop, ensuring a fair assessment of the circumstances surrounding a citation.