Muhammadu Buhari Failed Nigeria

0 comments

Muhammadu Buhari, who died on Sunday at age 82, was one of two leaders of Nigeria, along with Olusegun Obasanjo, to rule the country both as military dictator and as civilian president. He was a human rights disaster in the first role and largely inept in the second.

Born on Dec. 17, 1942, Buhari joined the nigerian Military Training College in Kaduna at age 19 and also attended training schools in the United Kingdom.He was already a brigade major by the mid-1960s,when the Nigerian Civil War broke out. From all accounts, he performed with distinction on the battlefield, especially during the conflict’s earlier stages as part of the 1st Division’s incursions into key rebel towns and villages.

His appetite for power may have been whetted by his participation, along with other military officers, in two early coups: The first, in 1966, brought Yakubu Gowon to power, and the second, in 1975, elevated Murtala Muhammed.His involvement in those actions probably aided his ascension to positions of greater authority within the military and the government.

Buhari became assistant adjutant general of the 1st Infantry division Headquarters in 1971 and acting director of transport and supply at the Nigerian Army Corps Supply and Transport Headquarters in 1974. Muhammed appointed him governor of what was then North-Eastern State in 1975, and Obasanjo made him federal commissioner for petroleum resources and chairman of the newly created nigerian National Petroleum Corp. in 1976 and 1977 respectively.

Military officers led by Gen. Ibrahim Babangida launched another military coup in December 1983, pushing out the ineffectual Shehu Shagari, the first democratically elected president of Nigeria.They appointed Buhari, as the senior officer among the coup plotters, to lead the country.

Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, then-dictator of Nigeria, is pictured Dec. 1, 1983, following a prosperous coup d’etat against Shehu Shagari. William Campbell/Sygma/Getty Images

Nigerians then were yearning for a leader with more discipline, and Buhari promised to provide it. What they got rather was a regime still remembered, decades later, for a severity and joylessness exceeded only by the homicidal Sani Abacha (1993-1998), whose appetite for slaughter and lucre has no parallels in Nigerian history.

Shortly after he became head of state, buhari reportedly made known his resolve to “tamper with press freedom,” and soon thereafter his administration enacted the infamous Public Officers (Protection Against False Accusation) Decree,otherwise known as Decree No. 4. Among other vague provi-Day-2016-GettyImages-547256642.jpg?resize=400,267 400w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/3-Muhammadu-Buhari-Nigeria-President-Army-Day-2016-GettyImages-547256642.jpg?resize=401,267 401w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/3-Muhammadu-Buhari-Nigeria-President-Army-day-2016-GettyImages-547256642.jpg?resize=800,533 800w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/3-Muhammadu-Buhari-Nigeria-President-Army-Day-2016-GettyImages-547256642.jpg?resize=1000,667 1000w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/3-Muhammadu-Buhari-Nigeria-President-Army-Day-2016-GettyImages-547256642.jpg?resize=275,183 275w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/3-Muhammadu-Buhari-Nigeria-President-Army-Day-2016-GettyImages-547256642.jpg?resize=325,217 325w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/3-Muhammadu-Buhari-Nigeria-President-Army-day-2016-GettyImages-547256642.jpg?resize=600,400 600w” sizes=”(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px” loading=”lazy”/>

Muhammadu Buhari, dressed in camouflage fatigues and a camouflaged hat, walks with others also in fatigues.

Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari (center) is accompanied by service chiefs and other senior military officers during an Army Day celebration in Dansadau, Nigeria, on July 13, 2016. AFP/Getty Images

Babangida’s coup-day description of Buhari as “too rigid and uncompromising in his attitudes to issues of national significance” might have been self-serving, but it captured the frustration many nigerians felt with Buhari’s short-lived tenure as military leader.

Had Buhari practiced what he preached, Nigerians might have endured the rigidity. But rumors of preferential treatment for his associates and ethnic allies rapidly hardened into concrete allegations. In 2021, the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria put out a statement saying that since 2015, Buhari had “maintained the illegal and unconstitutional practice of posting only Northern Hausa/Fulani Muslims to head the entire internal security architectures such as Nigerian Customs Service, Nigerian Immigration Service, Nigerian Police Force, Department of State Services, National Intelligence Agency and Nigerian Army.”

Although Buhari’s military tribunals imposed improbably long sentences on many leading political actors for corruption, there were curious exceptions. While Shagari, the deposed president, was merely placed under house arrest, alex Ekwueme, his vice president, was held in a maximum-security prison fornapped-2016-GettyImages-532695702.jpg?resize=401,267 401w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/4-Muhammadu-Buhari-Nigeria-President-Boko-Haram-Girls-Kidnapped-2016-GettyImages-532695702.jpg?resize=800,533 800w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/4-Muhammadu-Buhari-Nigeria-President-Boko-Haram-Girls-Kidnapped-2016-GettyImages-532695702.jpg?resize=1000,667 1000w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/4-Muhammadu-Buhari-Nigeria-President-Boko-Haram-Girls-Kidnapped-2016-GettyImages-532695702.jpg?resize=275,183 275w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/4-Muhammadu-Buhari-Nigeria-President-Boko-Haram-Girls-Kidnapped-2016-GettyImages-532695702.jpg?resize=325,217 325w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/4-Muhammadu-Buhari-Nigeria-President-Boko-Haram-Girls-Kidnapped-2016-GettyImages-532695702.jpg?resize=600,400 600w” sizes=”(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px” loading=”lazy”/>

Muhammadu Buhari bends down to speak with a young girl.

Nigerian president Muhammadu Buhari speaks with kidnapped Chibok schoolgirl Amina Ali, carrying her 4-month-old baby, as Borno state governor Kashim Shettima (center) looks on in Abuja, Nigeria, on May 19, 2016. Ali was one of the first of 219 abducted chibok schoolgirls to be found after more than two years in Boko Haram captivity. STRINGER/AFP/Getty Images

That Buhari had a zeal for pursuing public good seems clear; simultaneously occurring, he never really distinguished himself at it, and—intriguing for a former soldier—he was frequently enough deeply lacking in discipline.

He seemed to revel in the status offered by high positions more than in the execution of his duties. Persistent in his efforts to attain office—as evidenced by the fact that he ran for the presidency three consecutive times (2003, 2007, and 2011) before finally winning a fourth contest in 2015—he achieved little once he got there.

Buhari’s tenacity was probably driven, at least in part, by a need to close the circle on his controversial early tenure as military dictator. In any event, Nigeria in 2015 was a country in desperate need of relief from former President Goodluck Jonathan’s general ineptitude. In particular, Jonathan had failed to put down a vicious insurgency by Boko Haram, and Buhari, who had the distinction of having commanded three Nigerian Army divisions, was deemed the right man for the job.

The six months or so following Buhari’s swearing-in as president in May 2015 remain the high-water mark in public solidarity with a Nigerian leader.Voters expected Buhari to use his experience as a former soldier to take the battle to Boko Haram insurgents who were steadily gaining ground in the country’s northeast and had, in April 2014, carried out the brazen kidnapping of 276 schoolgirls in Chibok, in Borno State.

Sadly, the six months it took Buhari simply to form a cabinet would set the tone for a disappointing eight-year reign, when nearly every aspect of socioeconomic life in Nigeria took a turn for the worse. Peopel felt so insecure due to rising crime rates across the country that at least one state governor urged them to procure arms to defend themselves and ordered the state commissioner of police to issue licenses to residents “willing and fit to bear arms,” as the newspaper This Day put it. The economy suffered similarly: The constant threat to people’s security snuffed out the life of whatever remained of an anemic private sector.

Buhari’s poor first term and diving popularity raise the question of why he was reelected in 2019, and handily at that—56 percent of votes cast, compared with his challenger atiku Abubakar’s 41 percent. At least three factors appear to have worked in Buhari’s favor. One was the advantage of incumbency,especially in terms of mobilization and deployment of state power and resources. Second, Buhari, all told, still enjoyed the support of powerful retired Army generals who preferred him to a challenger whom some of them (former President Olusegun Obasanjo for one) had fallen out with. Abubakar was the standard-bearer of a political party, the Peoples Democratic Party, that had been ushered out of office only four years earlier in part due to public disgust at it’s corruption and fecklessness.Abubakar simply couldn’t persuade the electorate that he was any different from the man he was aiming to unseat.


A scuffed-up political poster and two mismatched shoes appear on a street.YASUYOSHI CHIBA/AFP/Getty Images

A group of men cheer and raise their hands.

The Unfulfilled Promise: Reflecting on the Buhari Presidency in Nigeria

The departure of Muhammadu buhari from the Nigerian presidency in 2023 marked the end of an era – one characterized by high expectations, notable challenges, and ultimately, a sense of unfulfilled potential. While acknowledging the inherent difficulties of governing a nation as complex and diverse as Nigeria, a critical assessment reveals a period where progress stalled across multiple vital sectors, despite considerable opportunity and initial public support.

It’s a common refrain that no single leader can instantly resolve a nation’s deep-seated issues. Nigeria, with its intricate web of ethnic and regional dynamics, presents a uniquely demanding political landscape. However,the breadth of Buhari’s shortcomings – spanning security,economic stability,and social cohesion – raises questions about the effectiveness of his administration. Consider, such as, the escalating insecurity. In 2015, when Buhari assumed office, the Boko Haram insurgency was largely confined to the northeast. By 2023, the conflict had spread, and new threats emerged, including widespread banditry in the northwest and escalating farmer-herder clashes across the country. Recent data from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) indicates a significant increase in violent incidents during Buhari’s tenure, with civilian fatalities reaching alarming levels.

A Late Embrace of democratic Principles

Buhari’s journey to embracing democratic ideals was, by his own admission, a gradual one. Reflecting on his past, he revealed in a 2012 interview that the dissolution of the Soviet Union served as a pivotal moment in his political evolution. He stated that it was then he “personally believed…that a multiparty democratic system was and is still superior to despotism.” This acknowledgement is significant, given his earlier role as a military head of state in the 1980s, a period marked by authoritarian rule.

This evolution, while commendable, highlights a potential disconnect between stated beliefs and practical implementation. While Buhari’s intentions may have been genuine, the reality of his presidency often fell short of the democratic principles he espoused. As a notable example, critics pointed to instances of suppression of dissent, restrictions on freedom of speech, and a perceived erosion of institutional independence during his time in office. The #EndSARS protests of October 2020, met with a forceful response from security forces, became a stark symbol of thes concerns.

Beyond Intentions: The Need for Tangible Results

the president’s commitment to his country and his stated desire for positive change are not in question.However, good intentions alone are insufficient to drive national progress. Nigeria’s economic performance during Buhari’s presidency offers a compelling illustration. Despite periods of oil price recovery, the nation struggled to diversify its economy, remaining heavily reliant on crude oil exports. GDP growth remained sluggish, averaging around 2% annually, far below the levels needed to address widespread poverty and unemployment. Furthermore, Nigeria’s debt burden ballooned under Buhari’s leadership, increasing from approximately ₦12 trillion in 2015 to over ₦77 trillion by June 2023, according to the Debt Management Office. This escalating debt poses a significant threat to the nation’s long-term economic stability.

The challenges facing nigeria are multifaceted and deeply entrenched. Addressing them requires not only a commitment to democratic principles but also a pragmatic approach to governance, a willingness to embrace innovative solutions, and a dedication to building strong, accountable institutions. The Buhari presidency, while marked by sincere aspirations, ultimately serves as a cautionary tale – a reminder that good intentions, without effective execution and a clear vision for the future, can fall short of delivering the transformative change a nation deserves.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment