Musk v. Altman week 2: OpenAI fires back, and Shivon Zilis reveals that Musk tried to poach Sam Altman

by Anika Shah - Technology
0 comments

Musk v. Altman: Power Struggles, Poaching Plots, and the Battle for AGI Control

The landmark legal battle between Elon Musk and OpenAI has entered its second week, evolving from a dispute over nonprofit charters into a high-stakes drama of corporate betrayal and ambition. At its core, the trial examines whether OpenAI abandoned its original mission to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI) for the benefit of humanity in favor of a profit-driven empire fueled by billions in Microsoft investment.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Core Dispute: Musk alleges he was deceived into donating $38 million to a nonprofit that later pivoted to a for-profit model.
  • The “Control” Conflict: OpenAI President Greg Brockman testified that Musk sought “absolute control” and majority equity before exiting the company.
  • Poaching Allegations: Former board member Shivon Zilis revealed Musk attempted to recruit OpenAI CEO Sam Altman to lead a rival AI lab at Tesla.
  • Massive Financial Stakes: Musk is seeking up to $134 billion in damages from OpenAI and Microsoft.

The Clash of Missions: Nonprofit Ideals vs. Corporate Reality

Elon Musk, who co-founded OpenAI in 2015 alongside Sam Altman and Greg Brockman, claims the organization’s current structure is a betrayal. Musk testified that he was led to believe the company would remain a nonprofit dedicated to the safe development of AI. However, he alleges that Altman and Brockman shifted gears, accepting massive investments from Microsoft and restructuring the company to operate a for-profit subsidiary.

From Instagram — related to President Greg Brockman, Altman and Brockman

The legal stakes are immense. Musk is asking the court to remove Altman and Brockman from their leadership roles and unwind the restructuring that converted OpenAI’s for-profit arm into a public benefit corporation. He is seeking as much as $134 billion in damages from OpenAI and Microsoft.

The “Tesla Painting” and the Fight for Equity

During his testimony this week, OpenAI President Greg Brockman presented a starkly different narrative. According to Brockman, Musk was never truly committed to a nonprofit model. He cited a 2017 event following a breakthrough in a video game called Dota 2, where Musk reportedly emailed that it was “time to create a for-profit.”

Brockman described intense six-week negotiations in 2017 where Musk pushed for majority equity, the right to choose most board members, and the role of CEO. The tension peaked during a meeting where chief scientist Ilya Sutskever presented Musk with a painting of a Tesla as a gesture of goodwill. When Brockman and Sutskever proposed equal equity shares among the founders, Musk reportedly declined, stormed around the table, grabbed the painting, and walked out.

“The one thing we could not accept was to hand him unilateral, absolute control, potentially, over the AGI,” Brockman told the jury.

Poaching Plots and the Tesla AI Lab

The trial also revealed Musk’s attempts to build a competing infrastructure while still affiliated with OpenAI. Shivon Zilis, a former OpenAI board member, testified that Musk attempted to recruit Sam Altman to lead a new AI lab at Tesla in 2017.

Evidence introduced by OpenAI’s lawyer, Sarah Eddy, included a draft FAQ document from 2017 stating that Tesla was building a “world leading AI lab” designed to rival Google/DeepMind and Facebook AI Research. Zilis further testified that Musk asked Andrej Karpathy, a research scientist, to provide a list of top OpenAI talent to poach. By 2018, Musk texted Zilis that there was “little chance of OpenAI being a serious force” if he focused his efforts on TeslaAI.

Financial Ambitions and Conflicts of Interest

Musk’s legal team, led by Steven Molo, attempted to paint OpenAI’s leadership as being driven by greed. Molo highlighted electronic journal entries from Brockman in 2017, where Brockman questioned what financial moves would take him to a $1 billion net worth. Molo also pointed out that Brockman now holds a stake worth nearly $30 billion.

Musk fires back at OpenAI attorney

The defense also raised concerns regarding conflicts of interest, noting that Sam Altman has steered OpenAI toward deals with companies in which he personally invests, including the nuclear fusion startup Helion Energy and rocket maker Stoke Space. Video depositions from former CTO Mira Murati and former board member Helen Toner touched upon the brief firing of Altman in 2023, citing a lack of trust due to alleged dishonesty.

The Billion-Dollar Endgame

The verdict of this trial could fundamentally alter the trajectory of the AI industry. OpenAI is currently racing toward an IPO with a valuation approaching $1 trillion. Simultaneously, Musk’s own AI venture, xAI—now a division of SpaceX—is expected to go public as early as June with a target valuation of $1.75 trillion.

The Billion-Dollar Endgame
Shivon Zilis

The courtroom atmosphere remains volatile. Brockman testified that shortly before the trial began, Musk sent him a text message warning: “By the end of this week, you and Sam will be the most hated men in America.”

What’s Next?

The trial continues into next week with critical testimonies from Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever. Following closing arguments, a jury will deliver an advisory verdict to guide the judge’s final decision on the damages and the potential restructuring of OpenAI.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment