The statements and letters, written with strong language, are full of indignation and fury: the United States Republican legislators claim that Canada has done very little to contain forest fires and the smoke that have contaminated the air of several states this summer.
“Instead of enjoying family vacations in the beautiful lakes and camps of Michigan, for the third consecutive summer, the inhabitants of Michigan are forced to breathe dangerous air because Canada has failed to prevent and control the forest fires,” read in a statement issued last week by the Republican parliamentary delegation of the State, making similar misive of republicans of similar to republicans of republicans of Iowa, New York, North Dakota, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
They have demanded greater thinning of forests, burnings prescribed and other measures to prevent fires from starting. They have warned that smoke harms relations between the two countries and has insinuated that the United States could include the issue in tariff conversations.
But what they have not done is recognize the role of climate change, an obvious omission and myopic, according to climatologists. They also overlook the disproportionate contribution of the United States to greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels such as coal and gas, which cause heat waves and more intense droughts, which, in turn, prepares the most destructive forest fire scenario, scientists affirm.
“Canada should blame the United States for its increasingly frequent fires,” said Jennifer Francis, a Woodwell Climate Research Center Cope Cope’s Cope, Massachusetts.
On Tuesday, the Canadian government announced almost 46 million dollars in financing for research projects on forest fire prevention and risk assessment. But Corey Hogan, parliamentary secretary of the Federal Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, said that international cooperation is needed.
“There are no people who want to do more about forest fires than Canadians,” said Hogan. “But I think this also underlines the international challenges caused by climate change … we need to address this problem globally.”
The country has “fought forest fires in this country with unprecedented indices since 2023,” when the largest forest fire ever registered in Canada occurred in Canada, said Ken McMullen, president of the Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs. This year’s first fire began in April, one of the earliest registration, and 2025 is now the second worst year.
Until Thursday, more than 700 forest fires burned throughout the country, two thirds of them out of control, with more than 72,520 square kilometers (28,000 square miles) burned in 4,400 forest fires so far this year, according to the inter -institutional Canadian center of forest fires. That is almost five times the surface that has been burned so far in the United States this year. Most forest fires are initiated by people, sometimes on the way, but mostly by mistake, although McMullen said that thunderstorms are the guilty of many of Canada’s fires, especially in remote areas.
McMullen said he has no interest in discussing the role of climate change, but the data shows that something has changed. The lagoons and basins have dried and the water that once reached the rear doors of the lake communities of Canada now usually find tens of meters (feet) away.
“People can form their own opinion about why it is,” he said. “But it is clear that something has changed.”
Denial of climate change
President Donald Trump has described climate change as a hoax, a belief that many members of the Republican Party share, and his government has worked to dismantle and definance federal climate science and data collection, with little or no resistance from Republicans in Congress.
It has proposed to revoke the scientific finding that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger the health and well -being of the public, which constitutes the central basis of the action on climate change in the United States. He declared a national energy emergency to accelerate the development of fossil fuels, canceled subsidies for renewable energy projects and ordered the United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on the climate, intended to limit the long -term global heating to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels.
Minnesota’s Republican state representative, Elliott Engen, said he believes in climate change, but now is not time to discuss it “because we have people with asthma who cannot leave throughout the summer.”
“That is not an immediate solution for my voters; that sounds like a guilt game without a solution,” said Engen, which is part of a group of Republican legislators who asked the International Joint Commission to review the Forest Fire Management Practices of Canada.
Maine’s Democratic representative, Chellie Pingree, said that forest fires also endanger the health and quality of the air in their state, but blamed the Republicans for not facing the crisis in front acting on climate change.
“Instead of accepting this reality and working together to find proactive and common sense solutions to prevent and mitigate these fires, Republicans bury the head in the sand,” he said.
The Wisconsin Democratic representative, Gwen Moore, criticized the letter of her republican colleagues to the United States ambassador to Canada, saying that those “who deny climate change should not write letters where people prescribe the actions of people to try to contain it.”
Difficult solutions
McMullen, the Canadian expert in forest fires, said that fire fight is not as simple as many seem to believe.
The country and its territories are vast and the fires often occur in remote areas where the best – sometimes the only one – action, if there are no residents or structures, is to let them burn or “they will create another situation for us in one, two, 10 or 20 years,” said McMullen.
The bones are prescribed to clean the undergrowth and other sources of ignition are used in some areas, but they are not practical or possible in some forests and meadows that are already burning, experts said.
McMullen has advocated a forest fire coordination agency in Canada to help display firefighters and equipment where they are needed.
But in terms of stopping the worsening of fires, “I don’t think there are much they can do,” said Jonathan Overpeck, a climatologist at the University of Michigan. He pointed out that the increase in temperatures melts permafrost in northern Canada, which dries and makes vast boreal forests much more likely to burn.
Instead, the two countries should collaborate in climate change solutions “because our smoke is their smoke, his smoke is ours,” said Overpeck. “As long as this heating and drying trend continues, we will have an increasingly worse problem.
“The good news is that … we know what the cause is … (y) we can prevent worsening.”
___
The climatic and environmental coverage of The Associated Press receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP standards to work with philanthropic organizations, a list of foundations and coverage areas that they finance in Ap.org.
___
This story was translated from English by an AP editor with the help of a generative artificial intelligence tool.
date: 2025-08-14 18:21:00