Eight years and three months after she was charged by the National Court, and had to resign as Minister of Education, Youth and Sports of the Community of Madrid, Lucia Figar is no longer definitively investigated in the Punic plot.
The Criminal Chamber of the Court yesterday notified an order confirming the decision adopted by the head of the Central Court of Instruction Number 6, the magistrate Manuel García Castellón, to file the case for Figar. In the resolution, the magistrates dismiss the appeal that the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office had presented against the investigator’s decision to dismiss the procedure for the former leader of the Popular Party for having contracted online reputation services from online reputation companies. Alexander of Peter.
In the order, to which EL MUNDO has had access, the magistrates of the Fourth Section maintain that “it has not been evident that the reputational reports issued were to preserve or personally favor the investigated Lucía Figar, in fact, of the documentary and expert evidence in the proceedings seems to reveal the opposite with crystal clarity since they were related to the position she held as Minister of Education of the Community of Madrid, with no record of the contrary, no report or note relating to personal activity. of that”.
The Chamber explains, when decreeing the definitive archive of the procedure opened against Figar, that the “initial indications” that led to his accusation in the Punic plot “have not been corroborated, through a process of rational and logical deduction”, therefore The archive decreed by García Castellón cannot be described as “unmotivated, without prejudice to whether or not its arguments coincide with the accusatory claims.”
“The references contained in the reports are to the policy of the institution, without prejudice to the personal actions carried out by it in the institutional representation that it embodies, and are referred to the aforementioned policy, and the political acts related to it” , emphasize the magistrates who, in turn, conclude that the former counselor of Esperanza Aguirre He used his social media profiles “exclusively for strictly official activities,” the court concludes.