ASEAN member states are maintaining diplomatic and economic engagement with Russia, citing a policy that prioritizes regional neutrality. While G7 nations have largely isolated Moscow, Southeast Asian countries continue to pursue trade diversification and energy security, often favoring local currency settlements to bypass Western-dominated financial systems.
Why ASEAN Avoids Bloc-Based Alignment
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) operates on a principle of non-alignment, which is essential for maintaining regional stability. The bloc is committed to maintaining a “central” role in regional architecture, avoiding a clear choice between major powers.
This stance differs from the G7, which has utilized coordinated sanctions and export controls against Russia. ASEAN’s refusal to sanction Moscow stems from a desire to preserve energy imports and agricultural supply chains. For countries like Indonesia and Vietnam, maintaining open channels with Russia is viewed as a pragmatic necessity.
The Shift Toward Local Currency Trade
A primary driver for ongoing engagement is the push to reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar. Russia has actively encouraged ASEAN members to use local currencies for bilateral trade.
By settling trade in local currencies, ASEAN nations aim to insulate their domestic markets from the volatility of international sanctions regimes. This strategy allows for the continued purchase of Russian fuel and fertilizer, which remain critical to the food security of several ASEAN member states.
Regional Divergence Within the Bloc
While ASEAN acts as a unified diplomatic body, the intensity of engagement with Moscow varies by country.
- Vietnam: Maintains deep defense ties with Russia, with a large portion of its military hardware originating from Soviet-era and post-Soviet Russian contracts.
- Indonesia: Has consistently advocated for a “free and active” foreign policy. During its 2022 G20 presidency, Indonesia resisted pressure from G7 members to exclude Russia from the summit, hosting representatives instead.
- Singapore: Represents the outlier within the bloc. As a highly integrated global financial hub, Singapore imposed unilateral sanctions against Russia, citing the need to uphold international law.
Consequences for Future Diplomacy
The divergence between ASEAN’s engagement and the G7’s isolationist policy creates a complex landscape for future summits. As the war in Ukraine persists, the pressure on ASEAN to pick a side is expected to increase.
ASEAN’s primary concern remains the “ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific,” which emphasizes economic integration over security alliances. By engaging with both the West and Russia, ASEAN member states are attempting to ensure that their domestic economic growth is not derailed by the geopolitical tensions of the North Atlantic. Whether this strategy remains viable in the long term depends on the extent to which Western powers are willing to tolerate trade links between their Southeast Asian partners and the Russian Federation.
Key Takeaways
- Neutrality: ASEAN relies on a strategy of bending with the wind to avoid being caught in the crossfire of major power struggles.
- Economic Pragmatism: Trade with Russia is largely focused on essential commodities, specifically energy and fertilizers, which are vital for Southeast Asian development.
- Financial Autonomy: The transition to local currency settlements is a deliberate attempt to gain immunity from Western-led financial sanctions.
- Internal Variance: While most ASEAN members remain neutral, Singapore’s decision to impose sanctions highlights that the bloc does not have a single, monolithic foreign policy toward the Kremlin.
Worth a look