The 2026 FIFA World Cup has faced intense scrutiny following a Round of 16 match between Argentina and Egypt on July 7, 2026, where Egyptian officials alleged the game was “rigged.” Egypt’s head coach Hossam Hassan and player Mostafa Ziko claimed officiating errors and VAR inconsistencies unfairly favored Argentina, allowing Lionel Messi and the reigning champions to advance to the quarterfinals.
Egypt Allegations of Match Rigging and Unfair Officiating
According to coach Hossam Hassan, a second goal was disallowed because a foul occurred roughly 20 seconds beforehand on the other side of the pitch. Hassan told reporters after the match that Egypt had been "treated unfairly" and described the situation as an "injustice."
Hassan’s criticisms extended beyond a single goal. He cited a disallowed penalty and a second incident that he claims should have been checked for a penalty for us was not even checked by the VAR. The Egyptian coach suggested that external pressures influenced the outcome, stating, “Perhaps they wanted to keep the world champion in the competition. Perhaps they wanted Messi to stay in the running.”
Forward Mostafa Ziko echoed these sentiments, explicitly calling the contest a “rigged game.” Ziko claimed that after Egypt established a 2-0 lead, the officiating shifted to work against them. “It wasn’t our fault. That referee… it seems like this match was rigged,” Ziko stated following the 3-2 loss.
Controversy Surrounding Folarin Balogun and VAR Misapplication
The Argentina-Egypt clash is the latest in a series of officiating disputes during the 2026 tournament. Earlier in the competition, the U.S. Men’s National Team (USMNT) faced backlash after FIFA reversed a red card suspension for Folarin Balogun. Balogun had received a red card during a match against Bosnia and Herzegovina, a decision later attributed to a misapplication of VAR rules.
FIFA’s decision to postpone Balogun’s one-game suspension allowed him to play in the critical Round of 16 match against Belgium. While the move drew anger from European commentators and soccer federations, former USMNT player Jonathan Bornstein defended the decision, describing the call as “proper.”
Analysis of the Argentina Comeback
Despite the officiating disputes, Argentina managed a dramatic rally to win 3-2. The victory ensures that Lionel Messi remains in the competition, which interest and viewership will be higher as long as he and his team are in the tournament.
While the VAR review that disallowed Egypt’s second goal appeared misplaced, other contentious calls were the type of borderline decisions that could go either way. Critics of the Egyptian camp argue that the team’s defensive collapse—allowing three goals in 25 minutes—was the primary factor in the loss, regardless of the referee’s performance.
World Cup 2026 Officiating Disputes
| Incident | Team Affected | Core Dispute | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balogun Red Card | USA | Misapplication of VAR rules | Suspension postponed; player eligible for Round of 16 |
| Disallowed 2nd Goal | Egypt | VAR foul review 20 seconds prior | Goal overturned; Argentina eventually won 3-2 |
| Penalty Claims | Egypt | Unreviewed foul on Mohamed Salah | No penalty awarded |
Tournament Status and Outlook
Off the pitch, the 2026 FIFA World Cup has been a tremendous success, on and off the field. However, the repeated controversies involving VAR and disciplinary reversals have placed a spotlight on FIFA’s officiating consistency. With Argentina advancing to the quarterfinals, the tournament maintains its high-profile star, though the Egyptian federation’s claims of “external factors” leave a lingering cloud over the integrity of the Round of 16 results.
Worth a look