Cardi B prevails in Civil Lawsuit

Publication Date: 2025/09/03 05:37:38

The Case Overview

Cardi B has won a civil lawsuit brought against her by Emani Ellis,a Beverly Hills security guard. The case stemmed from a confrontation in a hallway outside an obstetrician’s office, where ellis accused the rapper of assault, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

The Allegations

Emani Ellis initially sought $24 million in damages, claiming Cardi B scratched her with a long nail extension, resulting in a facial scar. Ellis alleged the incident caused her significant emotional distress.

Cardi B’s Testimony and Defense

Cardi B, whose legal name is Belcalis Marlenis Almánzar, testified over two days, offering a spirited defense. She consistently maintained her innocence, stating she did not touch, scratch, or spit at the security guard.

“I swear to God, I will say it on my deathbed, I did not touch that woman,” Cardi B stated outside the courthouse.

The rapper’s defense centered around her belief that Ellis was recording her with a cellphone, which prompted the confrontation but not physical harm.

Juror Deliberations and Verdict

After less than an hour of deliberation, the jury found Cardi B not liable on all counts. This outcome represents a complete victory for the rapper and her legal team.

Post-Trial Statements

Following the verdict, Cardi B expressed her gratitude to her lawyers, the jurors, the judge, and the press. She also noted the personal cost of the trial, having missed her children’s first day of school.

Key Takeaways

• Cardi B was found not liable in a $24 million civil lawsuit.
• The lawsuit alleged assault, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
• Cardi B maintained her innocence throughout the trial, denying any physical contact with the security guard.
• The jury reached a verdict in under an hour.

Looking Ahead

This verdict marks a significant win for Cardi B,allowing her to move forward without the burden of the lawsuit.The case highlights the importance of clear evidence and credible testimony in legal proceedings. It will be interesting to see if this outcome influences future legal challenges involving public figures and allegations of this nature.