Google Dubbed the ‘Worst Guy’ by Publisher CEO Over AI Content Use
Table of Contents
When Google became the dominant search engine around 2004, not everyone was happy. Everyone from book publishers to music studios blasted the company for helping itself to copyrighted content without paying.The search giant eventually smoothed things over but now, twenty years later, Google has become the media industry’s villain all over again-this time for gobbling that same content to train its AI tools.
Speaking at Fortune’s Brainstorm tech conference on Wednesday, People Inc CEO Neil Vogel-whose firm’s titles include People and Food & Wine-said other big AI firms are paying for publishers to use the content they create, but that Google has so far refused.
“Some AI shops are good actors.Open AI is a good guy,” said Vogel. “The worst guy is Google.”
Vogel made his comments during an on-stage panel discussion about the future of digital media in the new AI-driven internet. The comments come as media and news publishers are squaring off with AI companies at the deal table and in the courtroom. The New York Times has sued OpenAI alleging that it trained its chatbots on its content without permission or payment.OpenAI has called the suit baseless.
Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince, who was also on Wednesday’s Brainstorm panel, said it has become far harder for websites to attract traffic at a time when AI firms serve as “answer engines” that provide what people are looking for in fast snippets.
Prince observed that, in the past, Google served as a “great patron” to the Internet by ingesting the content of web pages in order to display links to those pages in response to people’s search queries. This arrangement directed traffic to companies’ websites,offering them a chance to make money from the visitors.
Today, that traffic is falling dramatically since AI-generated answers often provide all the details users need. Google is among those supplying AI answers based on information it has crawled from companies’ websites but, unlike its traditional search results, Google’s AI answers don’t deliver the same traffic to websites-leading the likes of Vogel to fret that publishers have already traded analog dollars for digital dimes, and are now trading those dimes for AI pennies.
the Ankler Refuses AI Partnerships, doubling Down on Paid Subscriptions
The Ankler, a Hollywood-focused media company, is actively rejecting partnerships with artificial intelligence (AI) companies, choosing rather to focus on its core strategy of paid newsletters and Substack content. This decision reflects a growing skepticism within the media industry regarding the long-term benefits of AI integration,particularly concerning creative control and revenue models.
Concerns Over AI’s Influence
According to Fortune,Ankler’s co-founder and CEO,Janice Min,expressed strong reservations about AI partnerships. “[I] don’t see any benefit to partnerships with AI,” Min stated. “I see the tech story happening over and over again. They come in and offer you money and it’s hard not to say no to shiny things.” This sentiment highlights a common concern: the initial financial allure of AI investment can overshadow potential drawbacks, such as loss of editorial independence and the devaluation of original content.
Min’s concerns echo a broader debate within the media landscape. Many publishers are grappling with how to balance the potential efficiencies offered by AI with the need to protect thier intellectual property and maintain audience trust. The Ankler’s stance suggests a belief that enduring growth lies in fostering direct relationships with readers through valuable, human-created content.
Blocking AI Crawlers and Prioritizing Subscriptions
to reinforce its commitment to this strategy, The Ankler has taken a proactive step by blocking all AI crawlers from accessing its content.This measure aims to prevent unauthorized use of its reporting and analysis for training AI models.
The company is firmly focused on building a media business centered around paid subscriptions. This model emphasizes quality journalism and exclusive insights, appealing to a dedicated audience willing to pay for premium content. The Ankler leverages platforms like Substack to distribute its newsletters and build a direct connection with its subscribers. Substack has become a popular platform for self-reliant writers and publishers seeking to monetize their work directly.
The Broader Media Landscape and AI
the Ankler’s decision is part of a larger conversation about the role of AI in journalism and content creation. While some media organizations are experimenting with AI-powered tools for tasks like transcription and data analysis, others are more cautious. Concerns about copyright infringement, the spread of misinformation, and the potential displacement of journalists are driving this caution.
Several publishers have begun implementing paywalls and subscription models to combat the challenges posed by the digital advertising market and the rise of AI-generated content. This shift reflects a growing recognition that quality journalism requires sustainable funding and a loyal audience.
Key Takeaways
* The Ankler is rejecting AI partnerships: The company believes the long-term costs outweigh the short-term financial benefits.
* AI crawlers are blocked: the Ankler is actively protecting its content from unauthorized use by AI models.
* Focus on paid subscriptions: The company is prioritizing a direct-to-consumer model through newsletters and Substack.
* Growing industry skepticism: The Ankler’s stance reflects a broader debate about the role of AI in media.
The Ankler’s commitment to a subscription-based model and its rejection of AI partnerships represent a bold bet on the value of human-driven journalism. As the media landscape continues to evolve, it remains to be seen whether this strategy will prove successful, but it underscores the importance of prioritizing quality, independence, and direct relationships with audiences in the age of artificial intelligence.