Putin Threatens to Cut Off Ukraine from the Sea

by Ibrahim Khalil - World Editor
0 comments

“`html





Russia’s threat to Ukrainian Ports adn the <a href="https://www.archynewsy.com/the-eu-celac-summit-closes-with-a-bittersweet-result/" title="The EU-Celac Summit closes with a bittersweet result">Black Sea Grain Initiative</a>

Russia’s Threat to Ukrainian Ports and the Black Sea Grain Initiative

Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that Moscow is ready to take “escalating measures” against Ukrainian ports and ships involved in grain exports, notably if they are deemed to be used for military purposes. This declaration follows Russia’s withdrawal from the Black Sea Grain initiative in July 2023,a UN-brokered deal that allowed for the safe passage of ukrainian grain through the Black Sea. Reuters reports that Putin alleges Ukraine is using the grain corridor for arms deliveries,a claim Ukraine and its allies deny.

The Black Sea Grain Initiative: A Brief History

The black Sea Grain Initiative, initially signed in July 2022, was crucial for stabilizing global food prices and ensuring the supply of grain from Ukraine, a major global exporter. Before the full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine supplied roughly 10% of the world’s wheat, 15% of its corn, and over 50% of its sunflower oil World Food Program. The Russian blockade of Ukrainian ports following the invasion threatened a global food crisis,particularly in countries reliant on Ukrainian grain imports.

The initiative established a safe maritime humanitarian corridor allowing commercial vessels to transport grain, foodstuffs, and fertilizers from three key Ukrainian ports: Odesa, Chornomorsk, and Yuzhny/Pivdennyi. The Joint Coordination Center (JCC) in Istanbul, Turkey, oversaw the implementation of the agreement, comprised of representatives from Russia, Ukraine, Turkey, and the united Nations. The JCC inspected vessels to ensure they weren’t carrying weapons and coordinated the safe passage of ships.

why Russia Suspended the Initiative

Russia repeatedly complained that the deal wasn’t benefiting them,citing obstacles to its own exports of grain and fertilizers. Specifically, Russia argued that Western sanctions hindered access to shipping, insurance, and financial services needed to facilitate its exports, despite the agreement’s provisions to exempt these from sanctions.Council on Foreign Relations details the complexities of sanctions and their impact on Russian exports.

Russia also alleged that Ukraine was misusing the grain corridor to launch attacks, a claim consistently refuted by Ukraine and its allies. These accusations served as justification for Russia’s decision to suspend its participation in the initiative on July 17,2023,and ultimately terminate it.

The Impact of Russia’s Withdrawal

The suspension and subsequent termination of the Black Sea Grain Initiative have had significant consequences:

  • Increased Global Food Prices: The disruption to Ukrainian grain exports has led to a rise in global food prices, impacting vulnerable populations worldwide.
  • Reduced Grain Supply: The amount of grain reaching global markets has decreased, exacerbating food insecurity in countries dependent on Ukrainian supplies.
  • Threat to Ukrainian Economy: Ukraine’s agricultural sector, a vital component of its economy, has suffered a major blow.
  • Increased Risk to Shipping: Without the safety corridor, shipping in the Black Sea has become more risky, with increased risks of attacks.

Russia’s New Threats and potential Escalation

Putin’s recent statement about “escalating measures” raises serious concerns about a potential increase in military activity targeting Ukrainian ports and commercial vessels. this could involve strikes on port infrastructure, naval blockades, or attacks on ships suspected of carrying weapons. Such actions would further disrupt grain exports and perhaps trigger a wider escalation of the conflict. The term “escalating measures” is deliberately vague, leaving open the possibility of a range of responses. Atlantic Council provides analysis on the potential implications of these threats.

What constitutes a legitimate military target?

International law dictates that military targets must be directly involved in military operations. Port infrastructure used solely for commercial grain exports would generally be considered a civilian object and therefore protected from attack. However, Russia argues that Ukraine is using the ports for military purposes, justifying potential strikes under international law. This claim remains unverified and is widely disputed.

Key Takeaways

  • Russia has withdrawn from the Black Sea Grain Initiative, jeopardizing global food security.
  • Russia alleges ukraine is misusing the grain corridor for military purposes, a claim Ukraine denies.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment