The humanitarian response to the Rohingya refugee crisis in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, faces significant scrutiny following reports of inefficient resource allocation and infrastructure failures. While monsoon-related landslides continue to cause fatalities in the camps, internal audits from the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) have raised concerns regarding the management of billions of dollars in international aid, citing unused medical facilities, equipment procurement errors, and a lack of long-term investment in refugee empowerment.
Monsoon Disasters and Ongoing Risks
Heavy monsoon rains in early July 2026 triggered landslides across the Cox’s Bazar refugee camps, resulting in at least 14 deaths, including children and staff at an Islamic learning center. According to reports from the region, these disasters remain a recurring threat for the approximately one million Rohingya refugees living in bamboo and tarpaulin shelters on denuded, hilly terrain.
While aid agencies have issued appeals for emergency funding in response to the latest casualties, the effectiveness of previous spending has come under fire. The Joint Response Plan (JRP) for the Rohingya humanitarian crisis, led by the government of Bangladesh, the UNHCR, and the IOM, currently seeks $710 million for 2026. This follows more than $5 billion in international aid provided since the mass exodus from Myanmar in 2017.
Audit Findings on Humanitarian Spending
A 2025 audit by the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS Report 2025/084) identified systemic issues in project planning and procurement within the UNHCR’s response. Findings reported by New Age indicate that millions of dollars were directed toward infrastructure that never became operational.
Specific examples of resource mismanagement highlighted in the audit include:
- Unused Medical Assets: A $1.5 million specialized hospital in Ukhiya and a 20-bed inpatient facility on Bhasan Char—complete with a $74,301 X-ray machine and $140,000 in solar equipment—remained unutilized.
- Procurement Duplication: UN partners reportedly spent $4.2 million on shelter materials that had already been procured, alongside $800,000 in redundant medical supplies and $194,000 in duplicate solar projects.
- Administrative Expenditures: The audit flagged $18,000 spent on honour boards, $23,000 on staff uniforms, and $27,000 on a documentary as unnecessary expenses given the urgent humanitarian needs.
Disparities in Aid Delivery
The OIOS audit also noted that 67 percent of funding over the past eight years has been dedicated to immediate relief, leaving only 17 percent for long-term solutions and empowerment. This focus has left many refugees without access to formal education or durable housing.
Furthermore, residents in the camps report a disconnect between allocated budgets and daily realities. While international agencies have reduced food assistance to $7 per person per month, internal reports suggest that procurement processes have occasionally prioritized items inconsistent with local needs, such as $182,028 spent on cutlery that remains largely unused in a community where traditional dining customs differ.
Accountability for Host Communities
The JRP framework includes a mandate to allocate 20 to 30 percent of its funding to benefit Bangladeshi host communities. However, documentation suggests that many local residents surrounding the camps have not received direct support, such as food aid or vocational training.
The current situation has prompted calls for the establishment of independent Quality Assurance and Financial Audit Committees. These proposed bodies would include representatives from the Bangladeshi government, donor nations, UN agencies, and the Rohingya diaspora to ensure that future humanitarian aid is transparent, properly implemented, and directly addresses the needs of both the refugees and the host population.
Related reading