Japan‘s “Empress of Pop” Ayumi Hamasaki stood alone on a brightly lit stage in Shanghai, her voice echoing through a stadium filled with empty seats.
Hours before showtime, she was informed that her concert could not proceed with an audience for “an inevitable reason”.
The vague explanation has become familiar to organisers of Japanese cultural events in China in recent weeks.
She chose to perform anyway, singing to more than 14,000 empty chairs.
Later, she wrote that the unusual concert had become one of her most memorable.
There was no audience but Hamasaki and her supporting artists went on with the show. (Supplied: Ayumi Hamasaki)
Her quiet, determined performance came just one day after another Japanese singer faced a much more abrupt interruption.
Maki Otsuki, best known for singing the theme song of the popular anime One Piece, had only just begun her set at bandai Namco Festival in Shanghai when the venue suddenly went dark.
Her microphone was cut, the stage lights were switched off, and two staff members led her away as confused fans looked on.The organisers soon informed the audience that the
Japan and China trade accusations after coast guard incident
Tokyo and Beijing have given different accounts of the clash as relations between the two countries continue to sour following comments made by japan’s prime minister about Taiwan.coremedia://imageproxy/106097688″>
In December, more than 40 per cent of scheduled flights from China to Japan were reportedly cancelled, amounting to over 1,900 flights. (Reuters: Loren elliott)
the cancellations came after Ms Takaichi told the Japanese parliament last month that a hypothetical Chinese attack on democratically ruled Taiwan could trigger a military response from Tokyo.
Her comments sparked a furious response from Chinese officials, with one diplomat threatening to “cut off that dirty neck” — in an apparent reference to the Japanese leader.
In another escalation on Tuesday, Japan’s coast guard said Chinese coast guard patrol ships entered Japan’s territorial waters around the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea, a flashpoint between the two nations.
Diplomatic tensions between China and Japan have spilled into the cultural sphere, prompting widespread event cancellations. (ABC News)
Li Hao, an associate professor at the University of Tokyo’s Graduate Schools for Law and Politics, said Beijing had interpreted Ms Takaichi’s comment to mean that Tokyo had shifted its long-standing position.
That position, outlined in a 1972 communique between the two countries, was that Japan supported Beijing’s One China policy, that there was only one chinese state, and Taiwan was part of China.
“If Japan had not raised those questions about Taiwan, China would not be tightening cultural controls in this way,” Dr Li said.
“They will argue it is indeed Japan that changed its position, not China. Few outside China would accept that logic, but that is how they see it.”
‘Enemy state clauses’
Table of Contents
Experts say Beijing’s approach could harden anti-China sentiment in Japan.
(Reuters: Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo)
The diplomatic mood darkened further when China’s embassy in Tokyo issued a social media post in November that referenced “enemy state clauses” in a UN charter.
It stated that if countries like japan took steps toward renewed aggression, countries like China have the right to take military action.
China and Japan have experienced cycles of improved relations followed by setbacks, frequently enough triggered by historical issues. The current friction stems from China’s criticism of japan’s position on the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration – statements issued during World War II outlining the terms of Japan’s surrender and its territorial future.
Specifically, China objects to Japan’s stance that thes declarations do not preclude Japan’s sovereignty over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands, a group of uninhabited islands claimed by both countries. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/china-japan-disagree-over-wartime-declarations-2023-12-28/
Japan swiftly refuted China’s claims, noting that the United nations General Assembly recommended removing references to these declarations nearly three decades ago, and that China itself voted in favor of the recommendation. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/china-japan-disagree-over-wartime-declarations-2023-12-28/
Expert Analysis: A Counterproductive approach?
Jeffrey Hall, a lecturer at Kanda University of International Studies in Japan, believes China’s rhetoric is unsettling for many in Japan. He suggests that Beijing’s approach risks fueling anti-China sentiment within japan, potentially hindering future diplomatic efforts.
“If China used this as a pretext to attack Japan, I don’t think the major powers in the UN would recognise it as a legitimate reason,” Hall stated, indicating a lack of international support for any aggressive action based on these historical grievances.
Implications for Regional Stability
The dispute occurs at a time of heightened geopolitical tension in the Indo-Pacific region. China’s assertive foreign policy and military buildup have raised concerns among its neighbors and the United States. Escalating tensions with Japan,a key US ally,could further destabilize the region.
Furthermore, focusing on historical disputes can detract from addressing more pressing contemporary challenges, such as economic cooperation and regional security threats like North Korea.
Key Takeaways
* China and Japan continue to disagree on interpretations of WWII history, specifically regarding the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations and the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands.
* Japan argues that the UN has previously considered removing references to the declarations in question.
* Analysts suggest China’s approach may be counterproductive, potentially hardening anti-China sentiment in Japan and isolating China internationally.
* The dispute adds to existing geopolitical tensions in the Indo-Pacific region.
Looking Ahead
The ongoing dispute underscores the complex and sensitive nature of Sino-Japanese relations. While historical issues are unlikely to be resolved quickly, both countries need to prioritize dialogue and find ways to manage their differences constructively. A continued focus on historical grievances risks further damaging bilateral ties and hindering cooperation on critical regional issues. Moving forward, a pragmatic approach focused on mutual benefit and shared interests is essential for maintaining stability in the Indo-Pacific.
Worth a look