Residents of Jakarta’s Pulomas District Sue Over Padel Court Noise
Residents in the Pulomas area of East Jakarta are taking legal action against the operators of a newly constructed padel court, citing excessive noise and disruption to their residential neighborhood. The case has been brought before the Jakarta State Administrative Court (PTUN), marking an escalation in a dispute that began in late 2024.
From Tennis Court Expectations to Commercial Operation
The conflict began when residents believed a demolished property would be replaced with a private tennis court. Mutia, a 45-year-classic resident, explained, “At first we thought about making a private tennis court, because the person has a house behind it. So that’s it, we didn’t have a problem.” However, the site was developed into a commercial padel facility, bringing with it increased traffic and noise levels. “It turned out that at the finish of October it started to get busy, there were flower arrangements, lots of cars. We just found out that this is commercial,” Mutia stated, according to DetikNews.
Noise and Disruption Concerns
The padel court operates from 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM daily, with two courts in constant use. Residents estimate over 100 vehicles access the facility each day, creating congestion on the single access road to their homes. Beyond the noise of the game itself – including shouting and ball impacts – residents have also reported disturbances from events held at the court, sometimes extending late into the night. According to Kumparan, one resident described the change in the neighborhood as a shift from a “quiet, comfortable…environment” to a much busier and noisier atmosphere.
Failed Mediation and Legal Action
Residents have attempted to mediate with the padel court’s management, requesting reduced operating hours, soundproofing measures and restrictions on parking. However, these efforts have reportedly yielded no significant changes. Frustrated with the lack of progress, residents pursued complaints through various channels, including the JAKI application and letters to city officials. They discovered discrepancies between the building area listed on the permit and the actual size of the facility, further fueling their concerns. They filed a lawsuit with the PTUN.
Permitting Issues
Residents initially received conflicting information regarding the padel court’s permits. While initially told that the necessary permits were not found, they were later informed that the permits were, in fact, in place. This inconsistency prompted further investigation and ultimately contributed to the decision to pursue legal action.
Ongoing Dispute
As of February 21, 2026, the legal case is ongoing, and the padel court continues to operate. Residents express hope that the PTUN will enforce regulations and address their concerns regarding noise, traffic, and the overall impact on their quality of life.